Page 1 of 1
Anita Shah's column
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:35 am
by Flossie
Her first impression of the candidates CVs before the first task
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvan ... -2012.html
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:40 pm
by Flossie
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvan ... vable.html
I agree with much of Anita's analysis, and the Maria's nap is irrelevant to the main issues. I think the Northern woman who offered to do the finances, even though she couldn't, had to go, she was inept in all things, including expressing herself competently.
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 3:45 pm
by Flossie
Anita makes some interesting and valid comments about the approach how employess should adopt when they feel they have suffered some injusitice or lack of appreciation.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvan ... inger.html
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 1:49 pm
by Flossie
And Anita devotes her piece almost entirely to the popular theme of the moment and raised by Lauren's comments about being attractive: attractive women and their supposed burdens. She does come to the correct conclusions though
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvan ... gance.html
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:53 pm
by Flossie
Anita makes some good points about the flaws in the last task which focussed purely on measuring profit, yet Sugar demanded that they produce a gourmet product. Anita seems to be a little disatisfied with some elements of the current Apprentice and I think she is right. The assessment of performance should be more than just profit, particularly considering the tasks don't really reflect real business situations.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvan ... -food.html